by Waguih W. IsHak, MD, FAPA; Kara Bagot, MD; Shannon Thomas; Naira Magakian, MD; Dina Bedwani, MD; David Larson, MD; Alexandra Brownstein; and Christine Zaky, MD
Dr. IsHak, Ms. Thomas, Dr. Magakian, Dr. Bedwani, and Dr. Zaky are rom Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles, California; Dr. Bagot is from Yale University School of Medicine, Yale Child Study Center, New Haven, Connecticut; Dr. Larson is from University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine; and Ms. Brownstein is from University of California Los Angeles.

Innov Clin Neurosci. 2012;9(10):13–26

Funding: Dr. IsHak has received grants in associated research areas as listed below: NARSAD on Quality of Life in Major Depression, Pfizer Monotherapy in Major Depression.

Financial Disclosures: None of the authors have a conflict of interest in the conduct and reporting of this review.

Key words: Insomnia, quality of life, sleep disorder

Abstract: Objective: Systematic review of the literature pertaining to quality of life studies in adults suffering from insomnia, by specifically addressing the following questions: 1) What is the impact of insomnia on quality of life? 2) To what extent do comorbid conditions affect quality of life in patients with insomnia? 3) What is the impact of insomnia treatment on quality of life? Design: Our search was conducted using the MEDLINE/PubMed and PsycINFO databases from the past 25 years (1987–2012), using the keywords “Insomnia” AND “Quality of Life,” “QOL,” “Health-related quality of life,” or “HRQOL.” Fifty-eight studies were selected for inclusion by two physicians who reached a consensus about the studies to include in this review. Results: The literature reveals that quality of life is severely impaired in individuals with insomnia, comorbid conditions significantly affects quality of life negatively, and sleep restoration techniques, including cognitive behavioral therapy and medications, are successful at improving quality of life. However, restoration of quality of life to community levels is still unclear. Conclusion: Insomnia and its comorbidities negatively affect an individual’s quality of life, and different modalities of treatment can produce improvements in physical and psychological wellbeing and quality of life. More research is needed to develop more interventions that specifically focus on improving quality of life in patients suffering from insomnia.


The World Health Organization (WHO) defines quality of life (QOL), as individuals’ perception of their position in life, in the context of culture and value systems in which they live, and in relation to their goals, expectations, standards, and concerns.[1] This conceptual framework is translated into patient-reported ratings of the degree of satisfaction one has with health, social, occupational status, and other life involvements. Hence, high QOL ratings are reflective not only of symptom reduction but also an overall improvement in the self-evaluation of one’s own health. This is especially important in assessing whether interventions have accomplished the goal of health restoration and not merely symptomatic treatment. Quality of life may be a more reflective lens through which to view the consequences of insomnia; it allows one to understand the significant impact this disorder can have on the daily lives of the people it affects,[2–5] as impairments in QOL typically are cited as the impetus for seeking treatment.[6]

Insomnia is defined as difficulty with sleep initiation or sleep maintenance, early morning awakenings or nonrestorative sleep, according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria. Such symptoms hold the potential to drastically affect the patient’s ability to maintain a sense of wellbeing and perception of self-satisfaction with health, occupational, and social functioning. Consequently, insomnia is commonly linked to a diminished QOL status for both primary (syndromic) and secondary (symptomatic) insomnia.[5] Insomnia is highly prevalent in the general population. Research reveals a prevalence of approximately 30 percent of insomnia symptoms with a range of 10 to 40 percent, depending on how insomnia is defined.[7] Somewhere between 10 and 18 percent of these individuals consider their difficulties with sleep to be severe and chronic.[8] Overall, insomnia is more common in women than in men, and its prevalence increases with age in both sexes.[5] Insomnia may be a primary disorder (a syndrome) or secondary to a variety of physical or psychiatric illnesses (e.g., sleep apnea, depression, anxiety), environmental factors (e.g., noise levels, temperature, seasonal changes) and/or psychosocial issues (e.g., current or upcoming stressors). Identifying and treating potential underlying conditions are priorities in the management of insomnia. Insomnia is associated with a number of adverse medical, social, and psychological consequences leading to QOL impairments.

The World Health Consensus report on sleep found relatively little research specifically devoted to the subject of evaluating QOL in insomnia.[9] The goal of this review is to examine QOL in patients with insomnia through an in-depth review of the topic’s published literature. While recent reviews have focused on how insomnia affects some aspects of QOL, such as daytime functioning, sleep quality, neurocognitive functioning, and societal burden,[2] QOL generally,[3] and QOL within the context of economic and public health consequences,[4] information about the extent of the role of comorbidities as well as the impact of treatment of insomnia on QOL remain largely unaddressed. Additionally there is lack of investigation of studies that compare different treatment modalities and the differential impact on QOL.

This paper aims to answer the following three questions: 1) What is the impact of insomnia on QOL? 2) To what extent do comorbid conditions affect QOL in patients with insomnia? and 3) What is the impact of insomnia treatment on QOL?

This review will attempt to answer the above questions via a systematic review of the published literature pertaining to QOL in insomnia. It will also identify knowledge gaps in the field and propose future areas of research that may deepen our understanding of this topic.


Data sources. A systematic literature search was conducted using the MEDLINE/PubMed and PsycINFO databases for the past 25 years (1987–2012). We used the keywords “insomnia” AND “quality of life,” “QOL,” “health-related quality of life,” or “HRQOL.” The reference list of identified papers and prior reviews were manually reviewed for additional studies. The initial search yielded 427 articles. The search was then narrowed to studies that only included measurement of quality of life. This narrowed search yielded 150 articles.

Study selection criteria. Two physicians reviewed the 150 abstracts using the following inclusion criteria: 1) articles in English or with an available published English translation, 2) publication in a peer-reviewed journal, 3) studies of humans, 4) studies (of any design) that focused on insomnia (not other sleep symptoms), and 5) studies that used at least one QOL measure or domains derived from QOL measures. Both physicians then conducted, independently, a focused review using the full text articles of studies that met the above criteria. The reviewers then reached a consensus about the studies to include in this manuscript.

Data extraction and yield. The study selection process yielded 58 articles meeting the aforementioned selection criteria. Research methodology and key findings were derived from the full text and the tables of the selected studies. The literature search and selection methodology are depicted in Figure 1.

QOL measures in insomnia. General QOL measures used in insomnia. The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) is a very widely used scale in evaluating health-related QOL (HRQOL) in a variety of medical/psychiatric conditions and in insomnia.[10–14] The SF-36 is a 36-item generic QOL measure that assesses eight domains specific to HRQOL: 1) physical functioning, 2) role limitation due to physical health problems (role physical), 3) body pain, 4) general health perceptions, 5) vitality, 6) social functioning, 7) role limitations due to emotional health problems (role emotional), and 8) mental health.15,16 All health measures are scored on scales of 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health. Community norms are set at a mean score of 50 (SD=10) on each of its two components: physical component score (PCS) and mental component score (MCS). The SF-36 has two abbreviated versions: the 12-item SF-12 and the eight-item SF-8.

There are several advantages to using the SF-36, such as the following: Reliability and validity have been extensively tested in many different populations; norms have been generated for disease-specific and general population; it is easy to complete; it allows for comparisons across disease states; and it has been shown to be sensitive to insomnia-related changes.[17–19] Limitations associated with the SF-36 include decreased sensitivity at extremes (either good or bad) and its lack of specificity to the illness it measures.[19]

The Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire Short-Form (Q-LES-Q) is a 16-item scale with a total score ranging from 0 (lowest QOL) to 100 (highest QOL) with established community norms mean score of 78.3 (SD=11.3).[20,21] The Q-LES-Q has been used in a wide variety of research studies of psychiatric disorders including insomnia.22

The World Health Organization Quality of Life—Brief Form (WHOQOL-BREF) is a 24-item questionnaire covering four domains (physical health, psychological health, social relationships, and environment)[23] has been used more commonly to measure QOL in other disorders where insomnia is also present.

The EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) is a five-item QOL questionnaire covering five domains (mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain and anxiety/ depression) and has been used in comorbidity studies.[24] Other investigators also used the QOL inventory, a 31-item questionnaire specifically designed for the study which includes questions related to sleep, cognitive function, daytime performance, social and family relationships, and health.[4] Details of the psychometric properties of the general QOL measures appear in a previous article by the authors.[25]

Insomnia-specific QOL Measures. Léger et al[19] developed a measurement tool, the Hotel-Dieu-16 (HD-16), to specifically evaluate QOL in those with varying severity of insomnia. Unlike the aforementioned instruments, the HD-16 was designed to control for comorbid illness that may confound the association between QOL and insomnia and was constructed based on interviews with 20 patients with ‘severe’ insomnia (two or more complaints of insomnia in the past month) and validated by applying the scale to patients classified as “good sleepers” (n=391), “mild insomniacs” (n=422), and “severe insomniacs” (n=240). Five dimensions (physical energy/the will to carry out tasks, cognition, social, and psychological) of QOL are evaluated over 43 questions. While this study has some limitations, including nonspecificity of several items (i.e., evaluates symptomatology common to many other disease states) and only one evaluated sample, thus the generalizability remains unproven; the face validity of the study appears sound. The authors concluded that an insomnia-specific QOL measurement is better able to capture the deficits in functioning and QOL directly attributable to insomnia and may better evaluate treatment outcome.

The Quality of Life of Insomniacs questionnaire was developed by Rombaut et al[26] to specifically evaluate QOL in insomnia. This instrument has been used in a few studies, and it has not been expanded into clinical or research settings.
Other QOL measures used in insomnia. The Nottingham Health Profile (NHP, 38-item covering 6 domains)[27] and the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP, 136 items covering 12 domains), both of which are generic measures, have also been used to detect QOL changes associated with insomnia.[18,19] McCall et al[22,28] used the daily living and role functioning (DLRF) and relationship to self and others (RSO) subscales of the Behavior and Symptom Identification Scale (BASIS-32) to assess QOL. The DLRF and RSO subscales have been shown to differentiate depressed patients with insomnia from those without insomnia.[22]


Insomnia has a large impact on an individual’s ability to maintain work, physical, and social performance as well as overall quality of life, as shown by the findings from reviewed studies (Table 1).

Studies using the SF-36 to assess insomnia and its impact on QOL showed that individuals with insomnia reported poor QOL.[10–13,16] Zamitt et al[11] used several instruments to evaluate the impact of insomnia on QOL in a sample of 261 “insomniacs” compared to a control group of 101 good sleepers. Individuals with irregular sleep patterns, sleep apnea, restless leg syndrome, periodic limb movement disorders, a history of psychiatric illness, alcohol and substance abuse, epilepsy, and human immunodificiency virus infection were excluded from the study. To evaluate QOL, Zamitt et al[11] used the SF-36 and the QOL inventory. The results showed a significant difference between the two groups (p<0.0001 MANOVA) on all eight SF-36 subclasses. In comparison to “good sleepers,” individuals with insomnia reported more health concerns that limited physical activity, caused more body pain, and caused more emotional difficulties.

Léger[17] explored the effect of insomnia on daytime functioning using the SF-36 to evaluate the QOL of three matched groups of 240 subjects with severe insomnia, 422 with mild insomnia, and 391 good sleepers. It was found that those with severe insomnia had lower QOL scores in the above eight dimensions of SF-36 than did those with mild insomnia and good sleep patterns. Mental status and emotional state were worse in both the severe and mild insomnia groups compared to the good sleepers.[17] In a study of insomnia and quality of life, Katz and McHorney[29] examined 3,445 patients diagnosed with chronic medical and psychiatric conditions. The results showed that patients with insomnia have lower quality of life, measured by the SF-36, independent of the presence/absence of a comorbid chronic illness. Furthermore, the study found that the effect of insomnia on quality of life is equal in severity to the effect of any chronic illness, such as congestive heart failure or clinical depression. Similarly, decreased QOL as a function of insomnia was shown to be comparable to QOL impairment due to chronic medical conditions, using the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP)[27] and the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP).[18,19]

In summary, insomnia negatively affects individuals’ quality of life and could cause increasing impairment in QOL with increasing severity of sleep disturbance.[3,30–35]


Insomnia commonly exists in the presence of medical, psychiatric, and psychosocial stressors.[36] Vallieres et al[37] found that unemployment, recent death of a friend/family member, recent end of a relationship, and personal illness are the most common precipitants for short-term insomnia (less than one month). Underlying stress may be one of the factors contributing to insomnia and could contribute independently to impairing an individual’s quality of life.[29] Stressors may also exacerbate the severity of insomnia as well as other comorbid conditions, which in turn may have several downstream effects on QOL and ability to function. Moreover, studies show that individuals suffering from insomnia have a greater chance of developing depression and anxiety leading to further QOL deterioration.[62] Research shows that insomnia was often comorbid with chronic illnesses or depression.[31]

Psychiatric comorbidities. It is estimated that insomnia affects anywhere from 50 to 80 percent of the treatment-seeking psychiatric population,[38] highlighting the importance of psychiatric comorbidities and/or causes of psychopathology. Additionally, 30 to 50 percent of the aforementioned population that suffers from chronic insomnia has one or more of the following psychiatric disorders: major depressive disorder, mania/ hypomania, an anxiety disorder (phobias, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic disorder, generalized anxiety disorder) and/or a substance abuse/dependence disorder.[39]

Depression. Sleep disturbance is an important component in the clinical presentation of depressive disorders. Insomnia is a particularly frequent complaint as it is reported by nearly 85 percent of depressed patients.[40] Unfortunately, insomnia remains the most commonly unresolved symptom of depression even after mood improvement following selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) treatment.[22] Many depressed patients attribute low daytime functioning, including poor concentration and memory, decreased reaction time and coordination, fatigue, mood disturbance, and anxiety to inability to obtain an adequate amount of nighttime sleep or sub-par quality of sleep.

A study performed by McCall et al[22] was designed to measure the impact of insomnia on the quality of life of inpatients with depression. The results showed lower QOL ratings in patients with comorbid insomnia. This difference was especially prominent in those using a measure of self-report, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), as compared to the clinician-rated Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD). In a study of residual symptoms in depression, approximately 40 percent of patients receiving fluoxetine reported symptoms compatible with nonrestorative sleep.[41] Compared to sleep disturbances related to initiation or maintenance of sleep, nonrestorative sleep is associated with greater daytime functional impairment. Therefore, targeting insomnia in depression may increase daytime performance and overall QOL.

Anxiety disorders. Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and insomnia commonly coexist, with at least 66 percent of patients with GAD experiencing comorbid sleep disturbances.[42] Similarly, GAD is the most common psychiatric disorder among patients with insomnia.[42] Brenes et al[43] found that 90 percent of older adults with GAD reported moderate to severe insomnia.[43] Individuals with significant insomnia often also experience somatic manifestations of psychiatric illness, such as elevated physiological symptoms of arousal (e.g., dizziness, headache, weakness, fatigue, palpitations, and gastro-intestinal distress).[44] Moreover, patients with insomnia report more attention disorders and memory complaints.[45] This may lead to impaired concentration and increase the risk of traffic accidents as well as fatigue and daytime sleepiness—symptoms associated with poor QOL.

Veterans returning from combat have been shown to demonstrate high rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and traumatic brain injury (TBI),[46,47] both of which are associated with a high prevalence of insomnia.[48] Additionally, all three diagnostic subcategories of PTSD, re-experiencing, avoidance, and hyper-arousal, may factor into the development of PTSD as they are associated with poor sleep hygiene and/or may be the impetus for frequent awakenings or delayed sleep initiation. In a study by Wallace et al[49] comparing the differential effects of PTSD with or without comorbid mild TBI (mTBI) on sleep and daytime functioning, the authors compared characteristics of sleep between healthy sleepers (control), individuals with insomnia plus PTSD plus TBI combined and individuals with insomnia plus PTSD alone. Although those participants with PTSD plus mTBI demonstrated similarities in type of insomnia experienced, short duration of sleep, and severity as compared to PTSD alone participants, the PTSD plus mTBI group indicated greater daytime sleepiness although they spent more of the night sleeping.[49] This is an important finding as insomnia due to decreased duration of sleep has been associated with poor HRQOL outcomes, such as increased use of the healthcare system, increased morbidity and mortality due to physical illness, and reduced work productivity.[49]

Childhood-related psychiatric disorders. Psychiatric illness in childhood can also have lifelong consequences on sleep quality and quality of life. Poon and Knight[50] investigated the downstream impact of childhood abuse/neglect on subjective feelings of sleep difficulty and the secondary effect that this has on perceived quality of life in adulthood. The authors postulated that neglect and abuse in childhood promote a neural set-up for poor attachment with hindrance of the development of positive interpersonal relationships later in life. The anxiety that this engenders in combination with heightened stress reactivity can contribute to insomnia secondary to the stress of psychosocial issues. This could further impact QOL and the ability to cope with emotional strain as well as diminish the ability to foster and maintain social relationships. Parental emotional abuse is associated with adulthood sleep complaints, which is consistent with indices of insomnia associated with emotional and interpersonal stress.

Medical comorbidities. Individuals with insomnia have 60-percent greater healthcare costs as compared to the general population due to over-utilization of the healthcare system.[51] This is evidenced by greater number of visits to the emergency department and outpatient physicians, increased use of pharmacotherapy, and more laboratory tests ordered,[52] proving to be a great economic and healthcare burden.[53] Of patients seen in primary care settings, approximately 10 percent suffer from chronic insomnia.[54]

Cancer. Insomnia affects up to 50 percent of cancer patients, contributing to feelings of fatigue, and possibly immunosuppression.[55,56] In a cross-sectional study of 120 elderly patients with cancer, Cheng and Lee[55] found that those with a symptom cluster of insomnia, pain, and fatigue reported the lowest QOL, based on Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G) scores and experienced the greatest decrements in functioning. They concluded that as 5.5 to 18.8 percent of elderly cancer patients have co-occurrence of the aforementioned symptom cluster, the combined impact of the three serve to decrease QOL and perceived and actual functioning. Further research needs to be done to study the individual impact of pain, fatigue and insomnia on QOL and functional status in this unique population.[55]

Neurological disorders. Insomnia may also exacerbate symptoms of TBI possibly due to injury to the neural circuitry that regulates sleep, side effects of medications used to treat complications of TBI, or comorbid psychiatric, pain, or medical disorders.[49] Insomnia may further contribute to worsening symptoms of TBI by impeding the healing process that occurs during sleep. The estimated prevalence of insomnia in those with TBI varies widely from 21 to 93 percent.[57,58]

Comorbid insomnia is also a common problem in those with neurodegenerative disorders, such as Parkinson’s or Alzheimer’s disease. In certain neurological conditions, insomnia may be considered a direct result of the disease itself or secondary to other factors associated with it, such as pain, depression, or treatment medications.[59] Caap-Ahlgren and Devlin60 investigated the impact of insomnia on QOL in a population of 102 patients with comorbid Parkinson’s disease and found that they had lower scores on each domain of QOL, as measured by SF-36, as compared to patients with Parkinson’s disease with no insomnia.[60]

Patients admitted to the ICU. Insomnia is well recognized in the intensive care unit (ICU).[61] Despite exhibiting normal duration of sleep, patients usually demonstrate poor quality and abnormal patterns of sleep. Poor sleep quality can continue in patients after discharge.[62] There is evidence that even the recollection of the difficulties experienced while on an ICU can negatively impact sleep six months after discharge.[62] These sleep disturbances have been found to contribute to significant continuing decrements in HRQOL in all domains of the EuroQol-5 and to the inability to return to prior functioning.[62] Lack of treatment may contribute to impaired QOL.[63]

Congestive heart failure (CHF). In a study conducted by Krakow et al,[64] insomnia and sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) were the most common causes of sleep disturbances in patients with CHF. Additionally, Johansson et al[65] found that in elderly patients with CHF, 42 percent demonstrated SDB as compared to eight percent in those without CHF (p=0.001). In regard to insomnia, of those with comorbid CHF, 72 percent had difficulty maintaining sleep (as compared to 50% in non-CHF patients; p=0.05), and 25 percent exhibited daytime fatigue (as compared to 8% in non-CHF patients; p=0.05).[65]

The elderly patients that demonstrated symptoms of insomnia or SDB and comorbid CHF had worse QOL scores compared to those without CHF. Furthermore, decrements in the physical composite score of the SF-36 were associated with the following signs of insomnia (p<0.05): difficulty initiating or maintaining sleep, early morning awakening, and nonrestorative sleep. Nonrestorative sleep was also associated with a deficit in the mental health composite score (p<0.05).[65] A study to evaluate the impact of nasal dilator strips (NDS) on sleep quality, SDB, and QOL was done in nonobese adults with sleep disturbances. The participants consisted of 42 subjects in the treatment group and 38 subjects in the control group. At four weeks follow-up, the treatment group reported significant improvements in insomnia severity and sleep quality and improvement in Q-LES-Q (mean d=0.51), compared to small, statistically insignificant changes in the control group.[64]

Comorbid sleep disorders. Although sleep disorders such as obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), SDB, narcolepsy, snoring and restless leg syndrome/periodic limb movement are considered separate disease entities from insomnia, the co-occurrence of the two and their combined impact on QOL is important to consider. To study characteristics of insomnia and their impact on QOL in a population of patients with OSA and comorbid insomnia, Bjornsdottir et al[66] evaluated 824 patients with OSA and 762 healthy controls. In regard to symptoms of insomnia, they found that compared to their healthy counterparts, those with OSA encountered greater difficulties with sleep maintenance. They also found that women with OSA had greater sleep onset latency as compared to women without OSA. Additionally, increased difficulty initiating and/or maintaining sleep was associated with poorer QOL (SF-12). Individuals with OSA also demonstrated more impairment in physical and mental domains of perceived QOL.[66]


As the impact of insomnia on health and wellbeing might be under-recognized, many patients do not seek medical care early in the course of sleep disturbance, resulting in a significant amount of under-treatment and inadequate treatment.[67] As 85 to 90 percent of chronic insomnia is attributable to comorbidities, including circadian rhythm disorders, physical and psychiatric illness, concurrent substance abuse, and/or pharmacotherapy for comorbid illness,[8] cessation of medication/drug use and/or treatment of the primary disorder may adequately address sleep disturbances that would lead to a downstream impact on QOL. Behavioral as well as pharmacological interventions play an important role in treatment and improvement of daily functioning and one’s perception of QOL. The details of the reviewed treatment studies are shown in Table 2.

Pharmacological treatments. It has been shown that 5 to 8 percent of the general population use medications to aid in better quality, or greater duration of sleep.[8] There are three United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug classes for the treatment of insomnia: benzodiazepines, benzodiazepine receptor agonists, and melatonin receptor agonists.

Benzodiazepines. Benzodiazepines have been shown to be efficacious in reducing sleep onset latency and frequency/amount of nighttime awakenings. However, benzodiazepines have not been formally studied for their impact on QOL and their negative effects on next-day functioning (e.g., decreased memory and recall and daytime sleepiness), as well as the risk of tolerance and/or dependence when used long-term.[68]

Benzodiazepine receptor agonists (BRAs). BRAs, also known as nonbenzodiazepine sedative-hypnotics, have also shown efficacy in treatment of insomnia. They demonstrate the same hypnotic effects as benzodiazepines without the high propensity for dependence and development of tolerance.

There are also several randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) that have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of these medications on insomnia and the effect they have on QOL. In a RCT of 458 patients (231 randomized to treatment, 227 randomized to placebo) studying the impact of a 14-day standing zoplicone regimen with an additional six weeks of medication per patient request, the patients randomized to zolpicone had similar improvement in the psychological wellbeing component and global QOL of the QOLI as compared to the placebo group. But the treatment group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in the activity, sleep, social, and work domains.[67] These improvements were maintained at two-month follow-up.

Walsh et al[69] evaluated the efficacy of eszopiclone on sleep disturbances (latency of sleep initiation, time to waking after sleep onset, and total sleep time) and QOL impairments. After six months of study medication consumption, the patients receiving eszopiclone demonstrated greater improvement in bodily pain, physical and social functioning, and vitality as measured by the SF-36, as compared to those receiving placebo. They also demonstrated decreased sleep onset latency, increased time to waking, and total sleep time.[69] Scharf et al[70] corroborated these findings in an elderly population randomized to placebo or eszopiclone. In this subset of the population, the above sleep parameters as well as QOL showed improvement in the eszopiclone group on the following domains: household activities, leisure activities, mood, medication, and physical health, as measured by the Q-LES-Q.[70]

McCall et al[22] used the DLRF and RSO subscales of the BASIS-32 in addition to the Q-LES-Q to assess QOL in a population of individuals with comorbid unipolar depression and insomnia at baseline and following treatment with a combination of fluoxetine and eszopiclone or placebo. Following eight weeks of treatment with either fluoxetine plus eszopiclone or fluoxetine plus placebo, the eszopiclone group demonstrated significantly greater improvement in QOL as compared to the placebo group. Additionally, women demonstrated significantly greater improvement in QOL at the end of treatment compared to the men within the same treatment group. Both subscales of the BASIS-32 had moderate effect sizes (DLRF: 0.62; RSO: 0.44) and the Q-LES-Q had a small effect size (0.38).

Melatonin and melatonin receptor agonists. Melatonin is a hormone produced in humans by the pineal gland in the central part of the cerebrum. Melatonin agonists are safe, nonaddictive, sleep-inducing drugs that eliminate changes in the circadian rhythm. They can regulate sleep-wake cycles and re-adjust circadian rhythms.71 In a review evaluating the safety of different pharmacotherapeutic modalities in the elderly,[72] the authors concluded that melatonin agonists are safer to use than the traditional sedative-hypnotics that work on GABA receptors. The authors also found that melatonin receptor agonists also help to improve mood and quality of sleep in this population.

Other pharmacological interventions used for insomnia. No information is available on the impact of sedating medications, such as antidepressants (e.g., trazodone, mirtazapine, or tricyclics), antipsychotics (e.g., quetiapine, olanzapine, or chlorpromazine), or mood stabilizers (e.g., valproic acid, lamotrigine, or carbamazepine) on QOL in insomnia.

Potential negative effects of pharmacological interventions. In contrast to the above findings, sleep medications might have negative effects on QOL. In a survey of 2,822 individuals, Sasai et al[73] investigated the impact of insomnia and use of any sleep medication on the mental health (MCS) and physical health (PCS) composite scores of the SF-8. The authors divided their sample into good sleepers, good sleepers taking sleep medication(s), individuals with insomnia, and those with insomnia taking sleep medication(s). Insomnia was found to be associated with poorer MCS and PCS (scores <50; 50 is the population average). In regard to both MCS and PCS, insomnia individuals taking sleep medications scored lower than insomnia individuals not taking sleep aids. Additionally, good sleepers taking sleep medications demonstrated significantly lower scores on the PCS as compared to insomnia individuals not using sleep medications. As the authors found that the use of pharmacotherapy to aid sleep was significantly associated with decrements in perceived physical health QOL, they concluded that sleep medication is independently associated with poorer physical QOL due to medication side effects.[73] This is very important to keep in mind, especially in patients who are taking sleep medications on a long-term basis.

Non-pharmacological treatments. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT). Several studies discuss the clinical efficacy and cost effectiveness of providing CBT for insomnia to long-term hypnotic drug users in general practice.[74,75] These studies concluded that CBT could indeed improve the sleep quality of long-term hypnotic users with chronic sleep disorders.

Among these was an RCT with two treatment arms—a CBT-treated ‘sleep clinic’ group and a ‘no additional treatment’ control group— and post-treatment assessments at three and six months.[75] Two-hundred and nine patients aged 31 to 92 years with chronic sleep problems were enrolled. Among CBT-treated patients, SF-36 scores showed significant improvements in vitality at three months (p<0.01). Not only was there a notable reduction in symptomatology and health-related quality of life during active CBT, but also these reductions were maintained following the cessation of CBT.[76]

In a RCT of 209 patients with chronic insomnia using hypnotics randomized to either CBT or control (care as usual in a general medical practice), Dixon et al[74] found that over the course of six months, those receiving CBT demonstrated significant improvement on emotional role limitation, mental health, and physical functioning domains of the SF-36 as compared to controls.

Van Houdenhove et al[77] investigated the impact of CBT for insomnia (CBT-i) on symptoms of insomnia and HRQL on 138 patients with primary insomnia. The authors found that CBT-i was effective in improving sleep disturbances, including sleep onset latency, such that percentage of daily use of pharmacologic sleep aids decreased. Additionally, daytime functioning improved and HRQOL improved, especially in the emotional domain such that scores approached normative scores. CBT-i appeared to have the greatest effect on HRQOL and daytime functioning in those with greater pre-treatment impairment in psychological QOL and daytime functioning and those with severe insomnia.[77]

CBT has been also shown to effective in cancer patients with insomnia. In 1993, Espie et al[78] highlighted practical behavioral and cognitive techniques to manage insomnia. Based on the same techniques, the investigators evaluated the impact of treatment of insomnia on QOL in 150 patients diagnosed with cancer who were not undergoing concurrent radiation/chemotherapy for greater than one month of the study.[79] The authors found that the CBT group demonstrated significant improvements on various measures of sleep, including latency of sleep onset and waking after sleep onset, as well as on the physical and functional domains of the FACT-G QOL assessment tool as compared to the treatment as usual group.[79]

Behavioral therapy. In a study comparing a three-component behavioral intervention (comprising stimulus control, relaxation and sleep hygiene) to sham biofeedback (placebo), Soeffing et al[80] found no difference in SF-36 scores between groups at the end of treatment. A limitation of this study was the evaluation of outcome measure QOL relatively early after initiation of treatment, such that effects of therapy on QOL may not have yet been apparent.

Other nonpharmacological treatments. No information is available on the effects of light therapy, exercise, or nutrition on the QOL of patients suffering from insomnia.

Treatment limitations. It is important to note that a small number of cross-sectional and noncontrolled studies demonstrated equivocal results of the effect of treatment of insomnia on QOL in regard to both pharmacological and behavioral treatments. These results were found in regard to “insomniacs” versus “good sleepers” with treatment with zolpiclone,[81] insomnia individuals treated continuously with nightly zolpidem or discontinuous zolpidem treatment,[82] and individual versus group CBT in insomnia individuals.[83] As there were several limitations in the study design in the aforementioned trials, such as the use of QOL domains instead of a well-validated measure of QOL and lack of control groups,[82,83] the results of these trials should be generalized with caution.

Nonpharmacological approaches for insomnia management are effective and can be first-line therapy.[68] However, CBT and other similar behavioral interventions are not readily available and that may limit their use, thus necessitating pharmacologic therapy.

Multimodal treatments combining sleep hygiene and CBT with hypnotic medications are helpful in relieving insomnia and improving their QOL.[3] More studies are needed to test the full effects of combined treatments on QOL in insomnia.


Insomnia produces clinically significant impairments in social and occupational areas of functioning, as evidenced by reduction of work productivity, frequent absenteeism, decreased cognition and mood, and increased morbidity of psychological and physical illness, accompanied by a greater healthcare burden due to chronicity of illness and direct and indirect costs to society. Furthermore, insomnia may predict future episodes of psychiatric illness. An individual’s perception of loss of or decrements in functioning may provide the motivation to seek treatment, thus addressing impairments in QOL may more accurately reflect efficacy of treatment than indices of disease or illness. As QOL is assessed by questionnaires investigating personal satisfaction with physical and psychological wellbeing, further investigation into insomnia-specific measures is warranted. Several studies have shown the sensitivity of the generic SF-36 in evaluating of patients with insomnia, with an inverse association between degree of sleep disturbance and QOL ratings. These relationships remain after controlling for comorbid psychiatric and physical illnesses. Thus a combination of specific and generic measurement tools may be indicated to best capture the relationship between insomnia and domains of QOL.

Successfully treating insomnia may improve a patient’s HRQOL; however, medication side effects may also negatively impact perceived QOL. Patients with insomnia and comorbidities, including mood and anxiety disorders, cardiovascular, renal, respiratory, neurological disorders, cancer, acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, and chronic pain have poorer QOL. As chronic insomnia is associated with increased healthcare burden, increased morbidity and mortality, and decreased day-to-day functioning, addressing insomnia in comorbid psychiatric and medical illness is important. Treating both conditions may improve the outcome for insomnia, comorbidities, and QOL overall. Interventions that specifically target QOL in insomnia are highly needed. Additionally, there remains a paucity of studies that specifically utilized QOL as primary outcome measure, thus further controlled trials needs to be done to address related gaps in knowledge.


Quality of life in insomnia is significantly impaired affecting overall subjective sense of physical or psychological well-being. The effect of insomnia on QOL may be related to psychiatric or physical comorbidities, medications, and/or various psychosocial issues or may be illustrative of a primary disease effect. Due to the lack of biomarkers to measure disease progression in psychiatric illnesses, symptom severity is generally used to measure the illness activity. However, symptom improvement is not the sole indicator of improvement, as restoration of QOL remains a key indicator of wellness. There is evidence to support the positive treatment effect on QOL in patients suffering from insomnia. These studies suggest that addressing both insomnia and co-morbidities has the potential of improving both conditions. However, more work is needed to enhance our understanding of QOL impairment in insomnia and to develop more effective and specific ways to ameliorate it.

1.     The World Health Organization Quality of Life assessment (WHOQOL): position paper from the World Health Organization. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1403–1409.
2.    Wade AG. The societal costs of insomnia. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2010;7:1–18.
3.     Kyle SD, Morgan K, Espie CA. Insomnia and health related quality of life. Sleep Med Rev. 2010;14:69–82.
4.    Léger D, Bayon V. Societal costs of insomnia. Sleep Med Rev. 2010;14:379–389.
5.    Buysse DJ, Angst J, Gamma A, et al. Prevalence, course, and comorbidity of insomnia and depression in young adults. Sleep. 2008;31:473–480.
6.    Morin CM, LeBlanc M, Daley M, et al. Epidemiology of insomnia: prevalence, self-help treatments, consultations, and determinants of help-seeking behaviors. Sleep Med. 2006;7:123–130.
7.    Mai E, Buysse DJ. Insomnia: prevalence, impact, pathogenesis, differential diagnosis, and evaluation. Sleep Med Clin. 2008;3:167–174.
8.    Ohayon MM. Epidemiology of insomnia: what we know and what we still need to learn. Sleep Med Rev. 2002;6:97–111.
9.    Insomnia, an international consensus conference report—Versailles, 13–15 October. Worldwide Project on Sleep and Health. Geneva: Division of Mental Health and Prevention of Substance Abuse, World Health Organization; 1998.
10.    Walsh JK, Krystal AD, Amato DA, et al. Nightly treatment of primary insomnia with eszopiclone for 6 months: effect on sleep, quality of life, and work limitations. Sleep. 2007;30:959–968.
11.    Zammit GK, Weiner J, Damato N, et al. Quality of life in people with insomnia. Sleep. 1999;22:S379–S385.
12.    Schubert CR, Cruickshanks KJ, Dalton DS, et al. Prevalence of sleep problems and quality of life in an older population. Sleep. 2002;25:889–893.
13.    Stein MB, Belik SL, Jacobi F, Sareen J. Impairment associated with sleep problems in the community, relationship to physical and mental co-morbidity. Psychosom Med. 2008;70:913–919.
14.    Berger AM, Kuhn BR, Farr LA, et al. Behavioral therapy intervention trial to improve sleep quality and cancer-related fatigue. Psycho-Oncology. 2009;18:634–646.
15.    Lis CG, Gupta D, Grutsch JF. The relationship between insomnia and patient satisfaction with quality of life in cancer. Support Care Cancer. 2008;16:261–2666.
16.    Byles JE,Mishra GD,Harris MA,Nair K.The problems of sleep for older women: changes in health outcomes. Age Ageing. 2003;32:154–163.
17.     Léger D, Scheuermaier K,    Philip P, et al. SF-36: evaluation of quality of life in severe and mild insomniacs compared with good sleepers. Psychosom Med. 2001;63:49–55.
18.     Reimer MA, Flemons WW. Quality of life in sleep disorders. Sleep Med Rev. 2001;7:335–349.
19.    Léger D, Scheuermaier K, Raffray T, et al. HD-16: a new quality of life instrument specifically designed for insomnia. Sleep Med. 2005;6:191–198.
20.    Endicott J, Nee J, Harrison W, et al. Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire: a new measure. Psychopharmacol Bull. 1993;29:321–326.
21.    Schechter D, Endicott J, Nee J. Quality of life of ‘normal’ controls: association with lifetime history of mental illness. Psychiatry Res. 2007;152:45–54.
22.    McCall WV, Blocker JN, D’Agostino R, et al. Treatment of insomnia in depressed insomniacs: effects of health-related quality of life, objective and self-reported sleep, and depression. J Clin Sleep Med. 2010;6:322–329.
23.     Skevington SM, Lotfy M, O’Connell KA. The World Health Organization’s WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment: psychometric properties and results of the international field trial. A report from the WHO-QOL group. Qual Life Res. 2004;13:299–310.
24.     Mathews WC, May S. EuroQol (EQ-5D) measure of quality of life predicts mortality, emergency department utilization, and hospital discharge rates. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:5.
25.     IsHak WW, Greenberg JM, Balayan K, et al. Quality of life: the ultimate outcome measure of interventions in major depressive disorder. Harv Rev Psychiatry. 2011;19:229–239.
26.    Rombaut N, Maillard F, Kelly F, Hindmarch I. The quality of life of insomniacs questionnaire (QOLI). Med Sci Res. 1990;18:845–47.
27.    Philip P, Léger D, Quera-Salva MA, et al. Insomniac complaints interfere with quality of life but not absenteeism: respective role of depressive and organic comorbidity. Sleep Med. 2006;7:585–591.
28.    Eisen SV, Dill DL, Grob MC. Reliability and validity of a brief patient-report instrument for psychiatric outcome evaluation. Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1994;45:242–247.
29.     Katz DA, McHorney CA. The relationship between insomnia and health related quality of life in patients with chronic illness. J Fam Pract. 2002;51:229–235.
30.    Roth T, Drake C. Evolution of insomnia:current status and future direction. Sleep Med. 2004;5(Suppl 1):S23–S30.
31.    Stein MB, Barret-Conner E. Quality of life in older adults receiving medications for anxiety, depression or insomnia. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2002;5:568–574.
32.    Hatoum HT, Kong SX, Kania CM, et al. Insomnia, health related quality of life and health care resource consumption. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;14:629–637.
33.    Léger D, Guilleminault C, Bader G, et al. Medical and socio-professional impact of insomnia. Sleep. 2002;25:625–629.
34.    Gureje O, Kola L, Ademola A, Olley BO. Profile comorbidity and impact of insomnia in the Ibadan study of ageing. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;24:686–693.
35.    Lee M, Choh AC, Demerath EW, et al. Sleep disturbance in relation to Health-related quality of life in adults. J Nutr Health Aging. 2009;13:576–583.
36.    Dikeos DG, Soldatos CR. The condition of insomnia: etiopathogenetic considerations and their impact on treatment practices. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2005;17:255–262.
37.    Vallieres A, Ivers H, Bastien CH, et al. Variability and predictability in sleep patterns of chronic insomniacs. J Sleep Res. 2005;14:447–453.
38.    Smith MT, Perlis ML, Park A, et al. Comparative meta-analysis of pharmacotherapy and behavior therapy for persistent insomnia. Am J Psychiatry. 2002;150:5–11.
39.    Breslau N, Roth T, Rosenthal L, et al. Sleep disturbance and psychiatric disorders: a longitudinal epidemiological study of young adults. Biol Psychiatry. 1996;39:411–418.
40.    Sunderajan P, Gaynes BN, Wisniewski SR, et al. Insomnia in patients with depression: a STAR*D report. CNS Spectr. 2010;15:394–404.
41.    Nierenburg AA, Keefe BR, Leslie VC, et al. Residual symptoms in depressed patients who respond acutely to fluoxetine. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999;60:221–225.
42.    Mahendran R, Subramaniam M, Chan YH. Psychiatric morbidity in patients referred to an insomnia clinic. Singapore Med J. 2007;48:163–165.
43.    Brenes GA, Miller ME, Stanley MA, et al. Insomnia in older adults with generalized anxiety disorder. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;17:465–472.
44.    Kim K, Uchiyama M, Liu X, et al. Somatic and psychological complaints and their correlates with insomnia in the Japanese general population. Psychosom Med. 2001;6:441–446.
45.    Léger D, Stal V, Guilleminault C, et al. Diurnal consequences of insomnia; impact on quality of life. Rev Neurol (Paris). 2001;1571270–1278.
46.    Lew HL, Vanderploeg RD, Morre DF, et al. Overlap of mild TBI and mental health conditions in returning OIF/OEF service members and veterans. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:6–11.
47.    Pittman J, Goldsmith AA, Lemmer JA, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorder, depression and health-related quality of life in OEF/OIF veterans. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:99–103.
48.    McLay RN, Klam WP, Volkert SL. Insomnia is the most commonly reported symptom and predicts other symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder in U.S. service members returning from military deployments. Mil Med. 2010;175:759–762.
49.    Wallace DM, Shafazand S, Ramos AR, et al. Insomnia characteristics and clinical correlates in Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder and mild traumatic brain injury: an exploratory study. Sleep Med. 2011;12:850–859.
50.    Poon, CY, Knight BG. Impact of childhood parental abuse and neglect on sleep problems in old age. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2011;66:307–310.
51.    Ozminkowski RJ, Wang S, Walsh JK. The direct and indirect costs of untreated insomnia in adults in the United States. Sleep. 2007;30:263–273.
52.    Hatoum HT, Kong SX, Kania CM, et al. Insomnia, health-related quality of life and healthcare resource consumption: a study of managed care organizations enrollees. Pharmacoeconomics. 1998;14:629–637.
53.    Rosekind MR, Gregory KB. Insomnia risks and costs:health, safety, and quality of life. Am J Manag Care. 2010;16:617–626.
54.    Estivill E, Bov A, Garca-Borreguero D, et al. Consensus on drug treatment, definition and diagnosis for insomnia. Clin Drug Invest. 2003;23:351–385.
55.    Cheng KK, Lee DTF. Effects of pain, insomnia, and mood disturbance on functional status and quality of life of elderly patients with cancer. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2011;78:127–137.
56.    O’Donnel JF. Insomnia in cancer patients. Clin Cornerstone. 2004;6:S6–S14.
57.    Lew HL, Pogoda TK, Hsu PT, et al. Impact of the “polytrauma clinical triad” on sleep disturbance in a department of veteran affairs outpatient rehabilitation setting. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89:437–445.
58.    Ouellet MC, Beaulieu-Bonneau S, Morin CM. Insomnia in patients with traumatic brain injury: frequency, characteristics, and risk factors. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21:199–212.
59.    Dauvilliers Y. Insomnia in patients with neurodegenerative conditions. Sleep Med. 2007;8:S27–S34.
60.    Caap-Ahlgren M, Devlin O. Insomnia and depressive symptoms in patients with Parkinson’s disease-relationship to health-related quality of life. An interview study of patients living at home. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2001;32:23–33.
61.    BaHammam A. Sleep in acute care units. Sleep Breath. 2006;10:6–15.
62.     Granja C, Lopes A, Moreira S, et al. Patients’ recollections of experiences in the intensive care unit may affect their quality of life. Crit Care. 2005;9:R96–R109.
63.    Lee CM, Herridge MS, Gabor JY, et al. Chronic sleep disorders in survivors of the acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 2009;35:314–320.
64.    Krakow B, Melendrez D, Sisley B, et al. Nasal dilator strip therapy for chronic sleep maintenance insomnia and symptoms of sleep disordered breathing. Sleep Breath. 2006;10:16–28.
65.    Johansson P, Arestedt K, Alehagen U, et al. Sleep disordered breathing, insomnia, and health related quality of life: a comparison between age and gender matched elderly with heart failure or without cardiovascular disease. Eur J Cardiocasc Nurs. 2010;9:108–117.
66.    Bjornsdottir E, Janson C, Gislason T, et al. Insomnia in untreated sleep apnea patients compared to controls. J Sleep Res. 2011;21:131–138.
67.    Goldenberg F, Hindmarch I, Joyce CB, et al. Zopiclone, sleep and health-related quality of life. Human Psychopharmacol Clin Exper. 1994;9:245–251.
68.    Morin AK. Strategies for treating chronic insomnia. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12suppl:S230–S245.
69.    Walsh JK, Krystal AD, Amtao DA, et al. Nightly treatment of primary insomnia with eszopiclone for six months: effect on sleep, quality of life, and work limitations. Sleep. 2007;30:959–968.
70.    Scharf M, Erman M, Rosenberg R, et al. A 2-week efficacy and safety study of eszopiclone in elderly patients with primary insomnia. Sleep. 2005;28:720–727.
71.    Turek FW, Gillette MU. Melatonin, sleep, and circadian rhythms: rationale for development of specific melatonin agonists. Sleep Med. 2004;5:523–532.
72.    Taylor SR, Weiss JS. Review of insomnia pharmacotherapy options for the elderly: implications for managed care. Popul Health Manag. 2009;12:317–323.
73.    Sasai T, Inoue Y, Komada Y, et al. Effects of insomnia and sleep medication on health-related quality of life. Sleep Med. 2010;11:452–457.
74.    Dixon S, Morgan K, Mathers N, et al. Impact of cognitive behavior therapy on health-related quality of life adult hypnotic users with chronic insomnia. Behav Sleep Med. 2006;4:71–82.
75.    Morgan K, Dixon S, Mathers N, et al. Psychological treatment for insomnia in the management of long term hypnotic drug use. Br J Gen Pract. 2003;53:923–928.
76.    Roth T, Drake C. Evolution of insomnia:current status and future direction. Sleep Med. 2004;5(Suppl 1):S23–S30.
77.    Van Houdenhove l, Buyse B, Gabriels L, Van den Bergh O. Treating primary insomnia: clinical effectiveness and predictors of outcomes on sleep, daytime function and health-related quality of life. J Clin Psychol Med Settings. 2011;18:312–321.
78.    Espie CA. ABC of sleep disorders. Practical management of insomnia: behavioral and cognitive techniques. BMJ. 1993;306:509–511.
79.    Espie CA, Fleming L, Cassidy J, et al. Randomized controlled clinical effectiveness trial of cognitive behavior therapy compared with treatment as usual for persistent insomnia in patients with cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;28:4651–4658.
80.    Soeffing JP, Lichstein KL, Nau SD, et al. Psychological treatment of insomnia in hypnotic-dependent older adults. Sleep Med. 2008;9:165–171.
81.    Léger D, Janus C, Pellois A, et al. Sleep, morning alertness and quality of life in subjects treated with zoplicone and in good sleepers. Study comparing 167 patients and 381 good sleepers. Eur Psychiatry. 1995;10:99S–102S.
82.    Hajak G, Cluydts R, Declerck A, et al. Continuous versus non-nightly use of zolpidem in chronic insomnia:results of a large-scale, double-blind, randomized, outpatient study. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2002;17:9–17.
83.    Verbeek IH, Konings GM, Aldenkamp AP, et al. Cognitive behavioral treatment in clinically referred chronic insomniacs: group versus individual treatment. Behav Sleep Med. 2006;4:135–151.